Assessing Compliance with Provisional Measures in Genocide Cases, the Good and the Bad
Assessing compliance with provisional measures in South Africa v. Israel and what the Court can do to improve adherence to its orders
Assessing compliance with provisional measures in South Africa v. Israel and what the Court can do to improve adherence to its orders
International law – mainly its main actors – has failed to provide care for all
Expectations from the International Court of Justice’s upcoming advisory opinion on Palestine
The CERD’s compromissory clause allowing States to bring disputes under the Convention to the ICJ is misused for strategic gains, rather than as a means of seeking redress.
By Oves Anwar, Director, RSIL Understanding the Jadhav Case 17th May, 2017 On Monday, both India and Pakistan presented oral arguments on provisional measures before the ICJ in the Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan). The case has generated considerable debate as well as much confusion. This is not surprising as, outside the small community of international law experts,…